<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>China&apos;s squeeze on Japan followed one line about Taiwan — updates</title>
  <subtitle>Corrections and revisions to this NewsNYou analysis.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://newsnyou.com/analysis/japan-china-taiwan-tensions/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://newsnyou.com/analysis/japan-china-taiwan-tensions/feed.xml"/>
  <id>https://newsnyou.com/analysis/japan-china-taiwan-tensions/</id>
  <updated>2026-08-19T20:00:00+02:00</updated>
  <author><name>NewsNYou</name></author>
  <entry>
    <title>correction: Fixed a dead citation URL (aljazeera-un-spar) — Al Jazeera&apos;s own link had grown a suffix since this analysis was written.</title>
    <link href="https://newsnyou.com/analysis/japan-china-taiwan-tensions/"/>
    <id>https://newsnyou.com/analysis/japan-china-taiwan-tensions/#rev-2026-08-19T20:00:00+02:00</id>
    <updated>2026-08-19T20:00:00+02:00</updated>
    <category term="correction"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;A site-wide link check found the citation 404ing; the article itself is still live at a slightly longer URL, confirmed by re-fetching and re-reading it before restoring the link. No claim in the analysis changed — only the link that was supposed to prove it. (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/5/japan-china-continue-to-spar-at-un-over-takaichi-remarks → https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/5/japan-china-continue-to-spar-at-un-over-takaichi-remarks-on-taiwan)&lt;/p&gt;</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>revisit: Rewrote the &quot;why this matters to you&quot; hook.</title>
    <link href="https://newsnyou.com/analysis/japan-china-taiwan-tensions/"/>
    <id>https://newsnyou.com/analysis/japan-china-taiwan-tensions/#rev-2026-08-19T18:00:00+02:00</id>
    <updated>2026-08-19T18:00:00+02:00</updated>
    <category term="revisit"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Operator decision, 2026-08-19: whyItMatters.outcome is now the page&apos;s primary hook and every analysis was rewritten to a single short, concrete, human-stakes sentence (docs/EDITORIAL.md, Permanent standards #4) — replacing several that had grown into full paragraphs or abstract policy-thesis phrasing. (the two governments most exposed to Taiwan&apos;s status are testing, in public, how far pressure can go without a shot fired → Japan and China are testing, in public, how far they can push each other before someone fires first.)&lt;/p&gt;</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
