<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The tariff that grades allies on a US law — updates</title>
  <subtitle>Corrections and revisions to this NewsNYou analysis.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://newsnyou.com/analysis/us-forced-labour-tariffs/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://newsnyou.com/analysis/us-forced-labour-tariffs/feed.xml"/>
  <id>https://newsnyou.com/analysis/us-forced-labour-tariffs/</id>
  <updated>2026-08-19T18:00:00+02:00</updated>
  <author><name>NewsNYou</name></author>
  <entry>
    <title>revisit: Rewrote the &quot;why this matters to you&quot; hook.</title>
    <link href="https://newsnyou.com/analysis/us-forced-labour-tariffs/"/>
    <id>https://newsnyou.com/analysis/us-forced-labour-tariffs/#rev-2026-08-19T18:00:00+02:00</id>
    <updated>2026-08-19T18:00:00+02:00</updated>
    <category term="revisit"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Operator decision, 2026-08-19: whyItMatters.outcome is now the page&apos;s primary hook and every analysis was rewritten to a single short, concrete, human-stakes sentence (docs/EDITORIAL.md, Permanent standards #4) — replacing several that had grown into full paragraphs or abstract policy-thesis phrasing. (Read as a labour-rights measure, the tariff makes little sense — few believe 60 major economies run on forced labour. Read as what analysts say it is — a durable, all-purpose tariff regime rebuilt on firmer legal ground — it makes complete sense, and it sorts allies and rivals alike by whether they have copied an American law. → A tariff sold as human rights actually just grades countries on whether they copied a US law.)&lt;/p&gt;</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
